Clinical Characteristics, Complications, and Outcomes of Heat Stroke Among Pilgrims During the Hajj Mass Gathering: A Prospective Cohort Study[1]
Summary
Prospective exploratory cohort across nine hospitals of adult Hajj pilgrims (>=18) admitted with confirmed heat stroke (core temperature >=40C plus CNS dysfunction). Twenty-three patients (mean age 65.1 +/- 10.5 years, 56.5% male); 15 (65.2%) were discharged from the treating ICU and 8 (34.8%) were transferred to an advanced referral center, with transfer used as a pragmatic surrogate for greater severity. The transferred group had higher admission creatinine (165.5 vs 130.5), markedly higher peak creatinine (275.9 vs 143.0, p=0.001), higher peak urea (17.4 vs 11.0, p=0.01), higher peak AST (p=0.015), and lower nadir platelets (p=0.007); they required mechanical ventilation far more often (75.0% vs 26.7%, p=0.026) and for longer (p=0.019). Authors stress the small sample makes this exploratory and that transfer status is confounded by health-system factors, not a validated severity predictor.
So what
The clinical-progression complement to the heat-prediction and heat-communication shelves: those pages forecast and prevent the heat presentation; this one describes what the classical exotic heat stroke that reaches an ICU actually does to the organs — an acute kidney injury / hepatic / thrombocytopenic / respiratory-failure picture concentrated in an elderly pilgrim population (mean age 65). It reinforces the geriatric-pilgrim page's core claim that the elderly pilgrim is the heat-fatality archetype, and gives a medical director a concrete organ-dysfunction checklist for the sickest tail. Honest limits travel with it — n=23, exploratory, transfer confounded by system capacity — so it should be cited as a clinical-picture description, not a triage rule.
Key findings
- Prospective cohort, 9 hospitals, adult Hajj pilgrims with heat stroke (core >=40C + CNS dysfunction)
- n=23, mean age 65.1 +/- 10.5, 56.5% male — the elderly-pilgrim heat archetype
- 15 (65.2%) ICU-discharged vs 8 (34.8%) transferred to advanced referral (transfer = severity surrogate)
- Severe tail = AKI (peak creatinine 275.9 vs 143, p=0.001), high urea/AST, thrombocytopenia, mechanical ventilation 75% vs 26.7%
- Explicitly exploratory (small n; transfer confounded by system factors) — clinical picture, not a triage rule
Read the paper
- Publisher (DOI) ↗may be paywalled
- PubMed ↗abstract · free
- PMC full text ↗free full text