← Library

AI-DRAFTED — PHYSICIAN REVIEW IN PROGRESSThe citation for this entry was checked against Crossref and PubMed, but its summary and interpretation were drafted by an AI model from the published abstract and have not yet been individually read by a physician. Read the linked source before relying on this operationally.
Paper ✓ verified

Mass Gathering Medicine: A Predictive Model for Patient Presentation and Transport Rates[1]

Summary

A 12-month survey of 201 Australian mass gatherings (combined audience >12 million) collected patient presentations and environmental factors under a standard reporting format. Across all event types the patient presentation rate was 0.99 per 1,000 attendees and the transport-to-hospital rate 0.027 per 1,000. Presentation rates fell slightly as crowd size grew, while relative humidity, crowd mobility, alcohol availability, and a bounded venue were associated with higher presentations. Three regression models were derived to predict presentation rates for future events.

So what

Establishes the baseline rates event planners still anchor to (~1 presentation/1,000; ~0.03 transports/1,000) and shows patient load is multifactorial — driven by weather, crowd behavior, alcohol, and venue boundary, not attendance alone. Predict with regression plus close attention to an event's own historical data.

Key findings

  • Patient presentation rate 0.99/1,000; transport-to-hospital rate 0.027/1,000 (all event types).
  • Presentation rate declined slightly as crowd size increased.
  • Higher presentations with increased humidity, greater crowd mobility, alcohol availability, and bounded venues.
  • Derived from 201 events / >12 million attendees; three predictive regression models produced.

Caveats & model limits

  • Arbon (2001) — aggregate baseline (PPR/TTHR) Aggregate rates from Arbon 2001, NOT the regression model; use for order-of-magnitude context only.
  • Arbon (2001) — aggregate baseline (PPR/TTHR) 201 events over 25,000 attendance, 12 months, Australia; 11,956 patients across all event types.
  • Arbon (2001) — aggregate baseline (PPR/TTHR) At a recurring show the Arbon generic model correlated only r=0.12 with observed presentations (Zeitz 2005) and tended to overestimate - a history-based method did better there.
  • Arbon (2001) — aggregate baseline (PPR/TTHR) Directional effects (crowd size, humidity, mobility, alcohol, boundedness, on-duty personnel) are documented but shown here as non-quantified flags, not applied to the number.
  • Arbon (2001) — aggregate baseline (PPR/TTHR) Session 6: Option B baseline (BA). Aggregate rates verified from Arbon 2001 PDM. Regression coefficients NOT recovered - see arbon_2004 scaffold (still DRAFT). | Session 10: superseded by arbon_2001_regression; kept as humidity-free fallback.
  • Arbon (2001) — full presentations regression Accounts for 64% of variance in presentations at 95% confidence (the SPORT term is weaker, p=0.0511).
  • Arbon (2001) — full presentations regression Authors: unsuitable for events with historically very high or very low PPR; use WITH historical data where available.
  • Arbon (2001) — full presentations regression PPR rises with temperature to the 25-29.9C band then DECLINES above 30C (behavioral adaptation); humidity is a more consistent predictor than temperature.
  • Arbon (2001) — full presentations regression Requires relative humidity (%). Indoor/outdoor defaults to outdoor when unset (a large coefficient). Mixed crowd mobility maps to SEATS=0 (conservative).
  • Arbon (2001) — full presentations regression At the index event both methods significantly under-predicted transports (actual 47 vs 27/22, p<0.05)
  • Arbon (2001) — full presentations regression Session 10: Model A (Table 3) transcribed from the primary source via UK ILL (RapidILL 27181535); verified=1 on 19.25 validation-case reproduction. Supersedes arbon_2001_baseline. | model-card caveats appended per ZEITZ_MODEL_CARD_MEMO (BA delegation, trust-batch 2026-08-08)
  • Arbon (2001) — transports from known presentations Requires a known/historical presentation count (TOTNUM). 34% of variance in transports at 95% confidence.
  • Arbon (2001) — transports from known presentations Prospective use uses Model A -> Model B chaining with a stated limitation; Model C own coefficient is not published in the primary source.
  • Arbon (2001) — transports from known presentations Session 10: Model B (Table 4) transcribed via UK ILL. Known-presentations transport pathway.
  • ppr_bounded_focused Event-category rate reference; the regression models drive predictions.
  • ppr_unbounded_extended Event-category rate reference.
  • observed_staffing_rate OBSERVED practice, NOT a recommendation — never used to source a staffing line.
  • staffing_skill_mix_observed Observed skill mix, not a recommendation.
  • alcohol_concentration_finding Closest quantified alcohol finding in the literature.
  • case_mix Case-mix reference (card caveat).
  • temperature_caveat Card caveat: temperature is non-monotonic; do not extrapolate PPR linearly with heat.
  • model_limits Card caveat on regression applicability.

Read the paper