← Library

AI-DRAFTED — PHYSICIAN REVIEW IN PROGRESSThe citation for this entry was checked against Crossref and PubMed, but its summary and interpretation were drafted by an AI model from the published abstract and have not yet been individually read by a physician. Read the linked source before relying on this operationally.
Paper ✓ verified

Risk communication in mass gatherings: a scoping review[1]

Summary

Scoping review (MEDLINE/Embase/Scopus/CINAHL/PsycINFO, 1990-2024; 29 articles) of risk perception and risk communication at mass gatherings, from the Johns Hopkins group (senior author Hsu). Risk-perception drivers identified: prior risk education, nature of the crowd, overcrowding, and event/venue characteristics. Communication-strategy themes: communications flow, timing and content of messaging, and modality mix (digital, physical, in-person). Headline gap: the EFFECTIVENESS of the various risk-communication strategies in use has rarely been evaluated.

So what

The comms-ics domain's missing review: it organizes the scattered literature on how to tell a crowd about risk — before and during an event — and lands on the same verdict as the crowd-management literature (strategies ubiquitous, effectiveness untested). For MGMI it connects the Purple Guide communications doctrine (codewords, minimise-alarm vs SG03 tension, M/ETHANE flow) to an academic frame, and its Hsu lineage ties it to the stampede epidemiology cluster - risk communication IS a crush countermeasure when done early. Free full text via PMC.

Key findings

  • 29-article scoping review, 1990-2024, five databases
  • Risk perception driven by education, crowd nature, overcrowding, venue characteristics
  • Strategy themes: communications flow, message timing/content, modality mix
  • Effectiveness of risk-communication strategies largely unevaluated - the field-wide gap
  • Hopkins/Hsu group - links to the stampede epidemiology lineage

Read the paper