Opportunities and Challenges Surrounding the Use of Wearable Sensor Bracelets for Infectious Disease Detection During Hajj: Qualitative Interview Study[1]
Summary
Qualitative interview study (Manchester/KAU; 14 Hajj stakeholders — technology experts, healthcare providers, Hajj service providers; task-technology fit + UTAUT frameworks) on wearable sensor bracelets for symptomatic and PRE-symptomatic infectious-disease detection at Hajj. Four themes and 13 subthemes: substantial financial and operational barriers; stakeholder and user motivation as adoption gatekeepers; and integration dependencies — infrastructure, device features, use-case fit, training, and organizational process. Concludes with implementation factors for effective adoption.
So what
The sober implementation counterweight to wearable-surveillance enthusiasm: before a bracelet detects a pre-symptomatic infection at scale, someone must solve cost, infrastructure, training, and the motivation of both pilgrims and providers — the study maps exactly those obstacles from the people who would run it. For MGMI's surveillance pages it completes a three-layer stack with Falender (wastewater = population), Greene-style syndromic feeds (system), and wearables (individual), each at a different maturity. Free PMC full text.
Key findings
- 14-stakeholder qualitative study on wearables for pre-symptomatic detection at Hajj
- 4 themes/13 subthemes: financial/operational barriers dominate
- Adoption gated by BOTH implementer and user motivation
- Integration needs: infrastructure, device fit, use cases, training, org process
- Completes the surveillance stack: wastewater (population) / syndromic (system) / wearables (individual)
Read the paper
- Publisher (DOI) ↗may be paywalled
- PubMed ↗abstract · free
- PMC full text ↗free full text