← Library

AI-DRAFTED — PHYSICIAN REVIEW IN PROGRESSThe citation for this entry was checked against Crossref and PubMed, but its summary and interpretation were drafted by an AI model from the published abstract and have not yet been individually read by a physician. Read the linked source before relying on this operationally.
Paper ✓ verified

The 2017 Barcelona terrorist attack: Real-time appropriateness and lessons learned from the management of an intentional vehicle-ramming mass-casualty incident[1]

Summary

Retrospective observational study of the August 2017 Barcelona (La Rambla) vehicle-ramming MCI (Sistema d'Emergències Mèdiques de Catalunya): 153 victims — 14 fatalities (9%), 139 injured (91%) — across a 13,608 m2 scene. Under compromised security and high casualty load, responders first used an expert visual surgical-priority triage (VIVE-Q) with immediate transport, then switched to the advanced prehospital triage model (META) once the healthcare area was secured. Both strategies achieved correct prioritization/destination in 98.1% of patients with NO in-hospital mortality; assistance time was shorter with VIVE-Q than META (19 vs 28 min, p=0.001). 25% of injured were severe (red), 87% of those with >=2 injuries, predominantly head and thoracoabdominal.

So what

The deliberate-attack MCI entry the library needed with hard numbers: it validates a TWO-PHASE triage posture — a fast expert-eyeball, scoop-and-run model while the scene is unsafe, converting to structured advanced triage once security is established — which is exactly the security-compromise adaptation the Auf der Heide assumptions and the MCI page argue for. Vehicle-ramming is now a signature event-adjacent attack mode (Nice, Berlin, London Bridge); this gives event planners a benchmarked response and an injury pattern (head + thoracoabdominal, multi-injury) to pre-stage for. Anchors the counter-terror shelf on the clinical side.

Key findings

  • 2017 Barcelona vehicle-ramming: 153 victims, 14 dead (9%), 13,608 m2 scene
  • Two-phase triage: VIVE-Q expert visual + scoop-and-run under threat, then META once secure
  • 98.1% correct prioritization/destination; zero in-hospital mortality
  • VIVE-Q faster than META (19 vs 28 min, p=0.001) - speed under insecurity
  • 25% severe; 87% multi-injury; head + thoracoabdominal predominant

Read the paper